By: Research in Gender and Ethics (RinGs) Steering Committee
This post is the first in the Woman-Centered Universal Health Coverage Series, hosted by the Maternal Health Task Force and USAID|TRAction, which discusses the importance of utilizing a woman-centered agenda to operationalize universal health coverage. To contribute a post, contact Katie Millar.
To make universal health coverage (UHC) truly universal we need an approach that places gender and power at the centre of our analysis. This means we need a discussion about who is included, how health is defined, what coverage entails and whether equity is ensured. To celebrate Universal Health Coverage Day RinGs has put together a list of ten arguments for why gender should be a central focus within UHC. If you agree, spread the word. Mail this list to a colleague or put it up on your website. If you think of other arguments in favour of a gender approach do let us know!
1. Gender affects both vulnerability to illness and access to health care.
Gender influences how women, men, and people of other genders perceive, behave, interact and this impacts the social experience of being sick and of seeking and receiving care. For example, gender norms and relationships in the Dominican Republic mean that women with lymphatic filariasis experience more social exclusion and shame than men, which in turn affects their health care seeking.
2. Gender combines with other social determinants in varied ways.
How gender is experienced can change when interacting with other forms of inequality, such as age, poverty, geography, caste, race, ethnicity, disability, and sexuality. Women and men from different socio-economic or ethnic groups can have vastly different experiences of the health system, which influences their access to health care, their treatment by health professionals and their health outcomes. In rural India, while nonpoor men and poor women were at opposite ends of ability to access care, among middle groups, non-poor women and poor men had similar health care seeking outcomes, but their decision-making and pathways differed significantly.
3. Recognise power if you want to tackle inequalities in health systems.
Marginalized people (ethnic minorities, inhabitants of informal settlements, people employed in illegal occupations, etc.) may have different access to health care or receive different treatment by health care workers compared to others. Power relations between individuals (for example, husbands and wives or health care professionals and patients) influences the effectiveness of policies and programmes to achieve universal health coverage. Despite being inclusive of the poorest, community-based insurance in India still generated inequities manifested by populations financially better off, with closer access to care and men submitting more claims than other populations. Moreover, access facilitated by insurance was not always appropriate with insured women having higher rates of hysterectomies and hospitalisation for fever due to the lack of effective and quality primary care services.
4. Coverage can’t be universal if some services and service users are routinely left off the list.
Financial protection packages (i.e. prepaid health services under universal health coverage schemes) often exclude essential and routine sexual and reproductive health services, such as delivery and emergency obstetric care, family planning, and safe abortion. Where sexual and reproductive health care is offered, it often exclusively focuses on maternal health and doesn’t address the needs of adolescent girls, older women, men and trans people.
5. Coverage can’t be universal unless it extends to all contexts.
Universal health coverage will not be achieved without additional research, resources and health system development in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. Realising universal health coverage in these neglected contexts means understanding and addressing the ways in which gender, power and conflict shape the experiences and needs of different communities and their ability to access services, as well as ensuring efforts to support and rebuild health systems to meet the needs of all citizens.
6. Paying out-of-pocket expenses for services adversely effects women.
This reflects hardship and injustice as women tend to have less income and less control over it and yet have to pay for health services that are more likely to not be covered by financial protection schemes.
7. Health system researchers must factor gender into their research.
To properly understand whether health systems are universal, we need data disaggregated by sex as a matter of good practice, regardless of whether sex or gender is perceived to be a factor. Once identified, inequities need to be prioritised and addressed. If this doesn’t occur we will continue to put in place policy and programmes which are inefficient and discriminatory.
8. Policy makers need to use evidence that incorporates gender and power in their decision making around access to services.
Social roles for women in many societies include childcare and infant feeding. Therefore, a potential consideration would be whether health facilities provide services for women and children at the right times (daylight, after school timings), with appropriate conditions (shelter from sun/rain in the waiting area, functional toilets, separate lines or waiting rooms for men and women), and with appropriate staff (breastfeeding consultants, female clinicians). When health centres are predominantly seen to cater to maternal and child health, mechanisms need to be explored to ensure access for men and other people.
9. Gender permeates all aspects of the health system and must be dealt with on different levels.
Gendered norms affect the health workforce (whether informal care provided at home is recognized and supported, recruitment and retention policies, staff security in remote areas or slums, maternity policies, workplace harassment policies and procedures). We need to address the gendered needs of all health workers, including close-to-community health providers who act as bridges between marginalised communities and health systems and are critical to universal health coverage. Gender also affects health financing (budgets for gender audits, the extent of financial protection available to different groups, out-of-pocket expenditures of different groups) and governance (representation of women and men in planning and oversight of all areas of health care and male involvement in maternal and child health).
10. We need this conversation to take place within and beyond the health system.
For example, men usually have more power and privilege than women, but they also have particular health needs. Men may be more likely to do dangerous jobs which can cause illness and disability, they are often influenced by harmful gender norms which encourage risk-taking, and in many settings they are less likely to visit a doctor when they are ill. Addressing these harmful manifestations of gender norms will require work beyond the health sector. We need to work with government ministries tasked with dealing with financing, gender, employment, education, and equality. Universal health coverage truly is everyone’s concern.
Want to read more? Check out these resources.
- The men’s health gap: men must be included in the global health equity agenda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Understanding CBHI hospitalisation patterns: a comparison of insured and uninsured women in Gujarat, India
- What does universal health coverage mean?
- Health Systems and Gender in Post-Conflict Contexts: Building Back Better?
- “Can it be that god does not remember me”: a qualitative study on the psychological distress, suffering, and coping of Dominican women with chronic filarial lymphedema and elephantiasis of the leg
- Gender equity and universal health coverage in India
- Making health insurance work for the poor: learning from the Self-Employed Women’s Association’s (SEWA) community-based health insurance scheme in India
- Universal access: making health systems work for women
- Who gains, who loses and how: leveraging gender and class intersections to secure health entitlements
- Placing gender at the centre of health programming: challenges and limitations
- Ten arguments for why gender should be a central focus for universal health coverage advocates: Policy brief
This post originally appeared on the blog of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
< Refugee women in DRC dancing.>©<2010>< Andre Thiel> used under a Creative Commons Attribution license:< https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/>