Skip to content
MHTF logo

Maternal Health Task Force

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Flickr
  • Email
  • About
  • Topics
  • Resources
  • Buzz
  • Blog
MHTF Blog ›

The Global Epidemic of Unnecessary Cesarean Sections (Part 2)

Posted on January 25, 2017January 30, 2017

By: Sarah Hodin, Project Coordinator II, Women and Health Initiative, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Read Part 1 here.

Trends over time

In 1990, roughly one in 15 babies on the planet was born via cesarean section surgery. In 2014, one in five babies was born via cesarean. The rates have increased dramatically over the past few decades in most regions, with the fastest growth taking place in North Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean. There is substantial variation within regions, with certain countries experiencing more rapid increases than others.

Country Previous Cesarean Rate (Year) Current Cesarean Rate (Year)
China 4.4% (1990) 36.2% (2011)
Colombia 16% (1990) 43.4% (2012)
Dominican Republic 20% (1991) 56.4% (2013)
Egypt 4.6% (1992) 51.8% (2014)
Georgia 3.8% (1990) 36.7% (2012)
Mexico 12.4% (1987) 45.2% (2012)
Morocco 2% (1992) 16% (2011)
Romania 7.2% (1992) 36.3% (2011)
Turkey 8% (1993) 47.5% (2011)

Considering data and measurement limitations is important when interpreting trends. Currently, there is no standard, internationally-accepted classification system to measure and monitor cesarean rates, which presents challenges when attempting to make comparisons between locations or time periods. Despite this limitation, though, available data illustrate a clear upward trend in most parts of the world.

Wide geographic variation

The highest cesarean rates are mostly found in middle-income countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, North America, Europe, Australia and Southeast Asia, while the lowest rates are found in sub-Saharan Africa. National cesarean section rates vary widely, ranging from less than 2% of births in Burkina Faso, Chad, Ethiopia, Madagascar, Niger and Timor-Leste—where many women do not have access to safe cesareans when they need them—to greater than 40% in Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Iran, Maldives, Mexico and Turkey.

Highest National Cesarean Rates Lowest National Cesarean Rates
1. Dominican Republic: 56.4% (2013) 1. Niger: 1.4% (2012)
2. Brazil: 55.6% (2012) 2. Chad: 1.5% (2010)
3. Egypt: 51.8% (2014) 3. Ethiopia: 1.5% (2011)
4. Iran: 47.9% (2009) 4. Timor-Leste: 1.7% (2009)
5. Turkey: 47.5% (2011) 5. Burkina Faso: 1.9% (2010)
6. Mexico: 45.2% (2012) 6. Madagascar: 1.9% (2013)
7. Colombia: 43.4% (2012) 7. Nigeria: 2% (2013)
8. Maldives: 41.1% (2011) 8. Guinea-Bissau: 2.3% (2010)
9. Uruguay: 39.9% (2012) 9. Guinea: 2.4% (2012)
10. Italy: 38.1% (2011) 10. Gambia: 2.5% (2010)

There is also wide variation within countries depending on location. For example, in the United States, facility-level cesarean rates ranged from 7.1% to 69.9% in 2009. Similarly, cesarean rates in China ranged from 4% to 62.5% in 2014 across provinces.

Read Part 3 here.

Graphs and adapted tables from Betrán et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLOS One 2016; 11 (2): e0148343.

—

Read a statement about the prevention of primary cesareans from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

To learn more, read:

CATEGORIESCATEGORIES: Maternal Health
TOPICSTOPICS: Cesarean Section Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Health Systems Inequities & Inequalities Monitoring & Evaluation Quality of Care Social Accountability Social Determinants

Looking for something specific?

Blog Series

  • Noncommunicable Diseases and Maternal Health
  • The Global Maternal Health Workforce
  • Quality of Maternal Health Care
  • See more>>

Archives

Blogs we follow

  • Healthy Newborn Network
  • Jacaranda Health
  • Jhpiego Field Notes
  • MamaYe
  • Maternal and Child Survival
  • NPR Goats and Soda
  • White Ribbon Alliance
  • Women Deliver

MHTF Disclaimer

The posts on this blog do not necessarily reflect the views of the Maternal Health Task Force. Our objective is to provide a platform for our Editorial Committee and other experts to post a myriad of data and evidence, as well as opinions/views that exist in the field which will contribute to expanding the maternal health dialogue.
  • About
  • Topics
  • Resources
  • Buzz
  • Blog

MATERNAL HEALTH TASK FORCE

Harvard Chan School Center of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health
677 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
MHTF@hsph.harvard.edu

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant T76MC00001 and entitled Training Grant in Maternal and Child Health. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.
  • About
  • Topics
  • Resources
  • Buzz
  • Blog
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Flickr
  • Email
Maternal Health Task Force Proudly powered by WordPress